Re: atop?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:47:34PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > These patches:
> > > 
> > > a) aren't upstream
> > > b) change the format of /proc/stat
> > > c) change process accounting in an incompatible way
> > > 
> > > So... no.
> > 
> > OK, fair enough (I wasn't aware of b) and c)).
> > 
> > Any other way then to achive the stated goals?
> 
> I haven't tried, but blktrace?

Very nice! One does get process -> I/O bandwidth. No filesystem info,
though, but I shouldn't be greedy ;)

If I find a minute I'll submit a package for this.

Thanks for pushing me to the right track!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpBIKCa2YUyG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux