Re: atop?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Would it make sense to add these patches to Fedora's kernel?
> > 
> > http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop
> > 
> > This could help in the area of extending laptop battery life by
> > detecting unneccessary disk access. The first step is to have some
> > disk I/O to process mapping.
> 
> These patches:
> 
> a) aren't upstream
> b) change the format of /proc/stat
> c) change process accounting in an incompatible way
> 
> So... no.

OK, fair enough (I wasn't aware of b) and c)).

Any other way then to achive the stated goals?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpUwzOeRdJcD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux