On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 18:30 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:25:04PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I've updated extras^H^H^H^H^H^HFedora devel sparse to 0.3 and built it in > > Koji. I have no clue if magic is required to get it into the tag used for > > new builds' dependencies. The following ought to be adequate to tweak the > > kernel spec to use it rather than build it (assuming the old spec crap > > wants to stick around conditionally for FC-6 copies). > > heh, I had this on my todo, but you moved quicker than I did :) > given we're not moving FC-6 cvs over to the new repo, and that they > already use disjunct spec files, we may as well make it unconditional. > > I don't think there's a great deal of point sparse'ing FC-6, > (or even F7 once its out). Having it just a devel thing to > check the latest tree seems to be more useful than checking the > latest -stable release. comments? Don't we want to make sure than when we push updates to FC-6 that the sparse error logs aren't getting worse (relative to an earlier FC-6 kernel)? (or have I misunderstood the workflow here?) [snip] _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
