On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 06:48:56PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 18:30 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:25:04PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I've updated extras^H^H^H^H^H^HFedora devel sparse to 0.3 and built it in > > > Koji. I have no clue if magic is required to get it into the tag used for > > > new builds' dependencies. The following ought to be adequate to tweak the > > > kernel spec to use it rather than build it (assuming the old spec crap > > > wants to stick around conditionally for FC-6 copies). > > > > heh, I had this on my todo, but you moved quicker than I did :) > > given we're not moving FC-6 cvs over to the new repo, and that they > > already use disjunct spec files, we may as well make it unconditional. > > > > I don't think there's a great deal of point sparse'ing FC-6, > > (or even F7 once its out). Having it just a devel thing to > > check the latest tree seems to be more useful than checking the > > latest -stable release. comments? > Don't we want to make sure than when we push updates to FC-6 that the > sparse error logs aren't getting worse (relative to an earlier FC-6 > kernel)? (or have I misunderstood the workflow here?) Well, if we had infrastructure other than 'eyeballs & diff' to look over then maybe, but until then, I don't think it really adds anything other than slightly increasing buildtime. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
