Re: Pre-release kernel versioning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




David Woodhouse schrieb:
> On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 15:03 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> In short: Kernel like for example kernel-2.6.20-1.3066.fc7 are in
>> reality 2.6.21-rc6-git5. That's not only confusing to users, it also
>> breaks outside kernel modules sometimes; just yesterday I saw a patch in
>> 3rd party repo applied that did this...
>>
>> +-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,21)
>> ++#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,20)
> 
> Those issues happen when you ship a kernel which is neither 2.6.20 nor
> 2.6.21. They don't magically go away if you call it 2.6.21 when in fact
> it's only 2.6.21-rc1.

Ehh, I'm not a kernel-developer and no real programmer at all, but I
can't follow here. Can somebody be so kind and tell me what I missing here?

And sure, I fully understand that compiling a external module might
break if the API that gets used changes between x, (x+1)-rc1 and (x+1).
But that doesn't happen that often.

CU
thl

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux