Chuck Ebbert schrieb: > Dave Jones wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote: >> > 2.6.21.1 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6 >> > update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is >> > out/2.6.21 get some more testing? >> >> We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out to testing, >> and if anything critical turns up before that becomes deemed stable, >> we could push a branched build off of .20 directly to updates. > > This doesn't make me very confident: > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Well, didn't we have such bugs in the past, too? We just had no compiled list of them afaik... > I'd like to see some kind of stability in FC6 while FC7 continues > shaking out 2.6.21 bugs. Well, getting a quite stable and working-on-lots-of-machines kernel on the install media of F7 is also quite important imho. /me votes for what davej suggested: "do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out to testing, and if anything critical turns up before that becomes deemed stable, we could push a branched build off of .20 directly to updates." Add a "send a announcement 'want do help getting the kernel of F7 tested? Then use "yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel*" and report any bugs'" to it. Well, something like that, I don't know if kernel* really works... CU thl _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
