Re: fedora-review complaining about un-owned qt/plasma directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gerald B. Cox wrote:

> I'm currently having a package reviewed here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971
> 
> fedora-review is complaining about several directories which are un-owned.
> These are
> existing directories... not created by me.
...
> Any assistance to understand this will be appreciated.  Thanks!
> 
> [ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>      Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde,
>      /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org
> [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids,
>      /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde/private, /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org,
>      /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde

Thanks, I've added ownership of these to kf5-kdeclarative and kf5-plasma 
packages (rawhide), next kf5 update for stable releases will include the 
fixes

-- Rex
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux