fedora-review complaining about un-owned qt/plasma directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm currently having a package reviewed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971

fedora-review is complaining about several directories which are un-owned.  These are
existing directories... not created by me.

If I check using rpm -qf directory_name; they show un-owned. 

Here is what I have in the spec file:
%files -f %{name}.lang
%doc README.md

%license LICENSE
%{_kf5_qmldir}/org/kde/private/weatherWidget/
%{_kf5_metainfodir}/org.kde.weatherWidget.appdata.xml
%{_kf5_datadir}/kservices5/plasma-applet-org.kde.weatherWidget.desktop
%{_kf5_datadir}/plasma/plasmoids/org.kde.weatherWidget/                                                           
Any assistance to understand this will be appreciated.  Thanks!

[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.

    Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde,
    /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
    Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids,
    /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde/private, /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org,
    /usr/lib64/qt5/qml/org/kde

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux