On Ter, 2016-04-19 at 00:52 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > Given that upstream uses kde-gtk-config now, any objection to > > EOL'ing kcm- > > gtk/xsettings-kde for f24+ ? > > > > Plan (probably) would be for f24+ builds of kde-gtk-config to > > Obsoletes: > > those other items for an upgrade path. > > > > Any comment or objection? > I think this is a step backwards. There is no replacement for > xsettings-kde. > kde-gtk-config is clearly not a replacement for xsettings-kde. It > supports > manually setting a small subset of the settings that xsettings-kde > automatically picks up from KDE settings. As far as I can tell, many > of the > settings that xsettings-kde sets are still not set by anything in the > Plasma > and kde-gtk-config stack. > > That said, I realize that kcm_gtk and xsettings-kde in their current > state > are stuck in the kdelibs4 universe and as such obsolescent. They need > to be > ported, but I do not have the time to work on the port. Hi, Thanks for detailed reports , of course we need this for kde4 on Fedora 23 project ..., maybe I just need a list of packages that will be removed from the F24 . > So in the end, I'm going to leave the decision to the people > actually > maintaining those 2 Fedora packages (i.e., mostly you). > > Kevin Kofler > _______________________________________________ > kde mailing list > kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > g -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
