Re: Plan for F22 KDE updates after F23 release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 04.10.2015 um 12:49 schrieb Patrick Boutilier:
On 10/04/2015 07:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 04.10.2015 um 12:35 schrieb Patrick Boutilier:
On 10/04/2015 05:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
<snip>

because that computers need to be online 365/24 and host services?

Then Fedora is probably not the distribution for you. Most people would
use something like CentOS in this case

that must be the reason for https://getfedora.org/de_CH/server/ i
guess...

most people need something like CentOS because they host random crap
like PHP applications breaking with new versions

the downside is when you host your own developments you stick with
outdated software for years and *then* you can't upgrade your system
because the difference between CentOS releases is way too big for a
online update

after 12 *online* dist-upgrades over 7 years taking around 2-5 minutes
per virtual server and we talk here about any service you can imagine i
can assure you Fedora was always suitable for hosting and given that
when somebody tals about "install from scratch" he still lives in the
windows world

Perhaps. But if I were to use Fedora as a server then I wouldn't be
using a desktop GUI at all so the changes to KDE and even Gnome would
not be an issue.

boah who talks about a GUI on a production server?
they are stripped down to 750-900 MB sysfs

but that don't change the fact that anything which is used in production is as identically as possible configured on my development machines which for sure have a GUI and serve a lot of other things for the internal network (in fact at home there is a single machine connected directly to a cable modem acting as router, switch, NAT, WLAN-AP and what not else) and such a setup simply takes some days to be the same

given that this machine was installed in 2011 with F14 (before systemd) and surivived the systemd/grub2 transition *anything* what now would require me to reinstall is simply broken proven by the history of the setup and so hardly can be called a improvement



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org

[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux