On 08/09/2015 03:39 AM, Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:38:43AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > I think then what you were trying to ask was "what would be > considered as qualifying as a KDE browser". For me, the only way you > can be a KDE browser is to show up in that application list as > sponsored by the KDE project (or whatever it is called now). My 2¢... I think this is a reasonable distinction for a desktop spin — these serve to showcase that technology on Fedora. This is different than the purpose-focused spins (now labeled "labs"), which aim at selecting particular software for a specific user need. (And, Fedora Workstation fits in to that, too, for that matter — hence Firefox over GNOME Web.) Maybe refusing to include anything non-KDE is one of the reasons we still don't have a Fedora Plasma Product focusing on power users and users who like to customize their OS.
Such users can easily install the browser of their choice and would not have to rely on the browser installed by default.
Mustafa
begin:vcard fn:Patrick Boutilier n:Boutilier;Patrick org:;Nova Scotia Department of Education adr:;;2021 Brunswick Street;Halifax;NS;B3K 2Y5;Canada email;internet:boutilpj@xxxxxxxxxxx title:WAN Communications Specialist tel;work:902-424-6800 tel;fax:902-424-0874 version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
