On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe refusing to include anything non-KDE is one of the reasons we still don't have a Fedora Plasma Product focusing on power users and users who like to customize their OS.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:38:43AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I think then what you were trying to ask was "what would be
> considered as qualifying as a KDE browser". For me, the only way you
> can be a KDE browser is to show up in that application list as
> sponsored by the KDE project (or whatever it is called now).
My 2¢... I think this is a reasonable distinction for a desktop spin —
these serve to showcase that technology on Fedora. This is different
than the purpose-focused spins (now labeled "labs"), which aim at
selecting particular software for a specific user need. (And, Fedora
Workstation fits in to that, too, for that matter — hence Firefox over
GNOME Web.)
Maybe refusing to include anything non-KDE is one of the reasons we still don't have a Fedora Plasma Product focusing on power users and users who like to customize their OS.
Mustafa
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
