On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 02:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Mustafa Muhammad wrote: > > > Some of my points were: > > > > > > 1) Almost dead upstream for Konq, vs thriving upstream for > > > Firefox, Konq > > > may have undiscovered security vulnerabilities, but the limited > > > number of > > > users is hiding them. > > > > The limited number of users also means nobody will be targeting > > Konqueror > > with attacks. IMHO, this is actually an advantage. > > PS: A Firefox 0-day exploited in the wild: > https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2015/08/06/firefox-exploit-found-in > -the-wild/ > Do we really want to expose our users to such risks? Up to now I had a neutral view in this discussion (I'm not against Konqueror though I don't use it), but I'm afraid that remark is making me think again, perhaps not in the way you intended. poc _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org