On Aug 1, 2015 14:02, "Markus Slopianka" <kamikazow@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 01 August 2015 08:58:44 Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> > But moving back from the lurch into the pedantic, my point was that it's
> > extremely
> > easy to install and use whatever applications you want - and if you're
> > unhappy with
> > the performance or capabilities of an application, that should be discussed
> > upstream.
>
> QtWebKit and KHTML are both unmaintained and insecure.
> I find it absolutely puzzling that some here argue for insecure defaults for
> web browsers but opening a few ports to make KDE Connect work out of the box
> is apparently out of the question security-wise...
>
> Why are insecure and unmaintained browsers even on the table as defaults?
>
I don't know... as I suggested above, why don't you ask upstream.
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
