On Saturday 01 August 2015 08:58:44 Gerald B. Cox wrote: > But moving back from the lurch into the pedantic, my point was that it's > extremely > easy to install and use whatever applications you want - and if you're > unhappy with > the performance or capabilities of an application, that should be discussed > upstream. QtWebKit and KHTML are both unmaintained and insecure. I find it absolutely puzzling that some here argue for insecure defaults for web browsers but opening a few ports to make KDE Connect work out of the box is apparently out of the question security-wise... Why are insecure and unmaintained browsers even on the table as defaults? _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
