On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:06:05PM +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 19:38 -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote: > > On 12/13/2014 10:32 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Naming things is famously hard; I agree — we could to better here. Any > > > suggestions? I would also like to find better way to distinguish the > > > spins like KDE desktop, where there is full QA and a number of > > > dedicated people, from those which get minimal effort and often have > > > serious problems that no one fixes. > > > > Fedora Workstation with GNOME > > Fedora Server > > Fedora Cloud > > > > alternate workstation versions (supported): > > Fedora Workstation with KDE Plasma > > Fedora Workstation with Some Other DE > > > > alternate workstation versions (unsupported): > > Fedora Workstation with Some Wonky DE > > Fedora Workstation with Some Other Wonky DE > > > > 1) important to note that the default workstation includes GNOME > > 2) hoping "supported" doesn't imply too much > > > > I could live with that as a description. However part of the question at > issue is what invocations of fedup should exist to get the result the > user wants, so a more compact form is needed. That's why I proposed a > way of doing that earlier in the thread. do we really need any of it for fedup? I would think people use fedup to upgrade, not to switch to a different product. Why would a gnome user want to type "fedup --product=workstation" instead of "fedup --product=nonproduct" - other than because of the misleading commandline options? Similar for KDE users if there would be product=KDE ? Richard --- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
