On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 19:38 -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote: > On 12/13/2014 10:32 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Naming things is famously hard; I agree — we could to better here. Any > > suggestions? I would also like to find better way to distinguish the > > spins like KDE desktop, where there is full QA and a number of > > dedicated people, from those which get minimal effort and often have > > serious problems that no one fixes. > > Fedora Workstation with GNOME > Fedora Server > Fedora Cloud > > alternate workstation versions (supported): > Fedora Workstation with KDE Plasma > Fedora Workstation with Some Other DE > > alternate workstation versions (unsupported): > Fedora Workstation with Some Wonky DE > Fedora Workstation with Some Other Wonky DE > > 1) important to note that the default workstation includes GNOME > 2) hoping "supported" doesn't imply too much > I could live with that as a description. However part of the question at issue is what invocations of fedup should exist to get the result the user wants, so a more compact form is needed. That's why I proposed a way of doing that earlier in the thread. poc _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
