On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maciek Borzecki wrote: >> It seems that the problems arise only for themes that use index.theme >> to indicate respective size icons (there are no <size>x<size> >> directories in top dir). > > The icon-theme-spec has this to say: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/latest/ar01s03.html > (Directory Layout) > | In the theme directory are also a set of subdirectories containing image > | files. Each directory contains icons designed for a certain nominal icon > | size, as described by the index.theme file. The subdirectories are allowed > | to be several levels deep, e.g. the subdirectory "48x48/apps" in the theme > | "hicolor" would end up at $basedir/hicolor/48x48/apps. > > It looks like the KFaenza theme authors took the "48x48/apps" only as a non- > binding example, whereas GTK+ 2 expects exactly this layout. Unfortunately, > the spec is not clear on that. I guess it'd be easiest to just fix the > affected themes to use the de-facto standard layout, it'd also be better for > consistency. Historically, all the themes have used that layout. That doesn't explain why it works in Xfce or Gnome, but does not in KDE. I ran some apps with GTK_DEBUG=icontheme but nothing obvious popped up. maciek _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
