Maciek Borzecki wrote: > It seems that the problems arise only for themes that use index.theme > to indicate respective size icons (there are no <size>x<size> > directories in top dir). The icon-theme-spec has this to say: http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/latest/ar01s03.html (Directory Layout) | In the theme directory are also a set of subdirectories containing image | files. Each directory contains icons designed for a certain nominal icon | size, as described by the index.theme file. The subdirectories are allowed | to be several levels deep, e.g. the subdirectory "48x48/apps" in the theme | "hicolor" would end up at $basedir/hicolor/48x48/apps. It looks like the KFaenza theme authors took the "48x48/apps" only as a non- binding example, whereas GTK+ 2 expects exactly this layout. Unfortunately, the spec is not clear on that. I guess it'd be easiest to just fix the affected themes to use the de-facto standard layout, it'd also be better for consistency. Historically, all the themes have used that layout. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
