Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> The goal there was that you could replace the proprietary fonts with >> Liberation fonts in word processor documents without breaking the layout >> of the document. Incompatible metrics would defeat that purpose. > > I've been using Liberation for the browsers, after I had heard that. I used > to have problems with DejaVu extending past the boundaries of boxes, getting > chopped off or overwritten by other text. > >>> Do you know which, DejaVu or Liberation, has the fullest UTF-8 >>> coverage? >> >> Definitely DejaVu. Coverage is one of their main goals, if not THE main >> goal. Liberation is newer (so had less time to achieve high coverage) and >> focuses primarily on metric compatibility. > > Thanks. I switched my system font back to DejaVu. It's nice to have a > reliable font that can display just about anything, without having to install > gazillions of non-Roman font packages that you'll never use. IIUC, the aliases: Sans Serif Monospace All point to DejaVu. But, I have no idea how to confirm this. _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
