Re: Incredible Shrinking Fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Although my initial complaint was that Liberation fonts are more
> compressed, while DejaVu is more expanded, making it more legible,

That's a necessary consequence of matching the metrics of Arial resp. Times 
New Roman.

The goal there was that you could replace the proprietary fonts with 
Liberation fonts in word processor documents without breaking the layout of 
the document. Incompatible metrics would defeat that purpose.

> Do you know which, DejaVu or Liberation, has the fullest UTF-8
> coverage?

Definitely DejaVu. Coverage is one of their main goals, if not THE main 
goal. Liberation is newer (so had less time to achieve high coverage) and 
focuses primarily on metric compatibility.

        Kevin Kofler

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org


[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux