I am a bit disillusioned with team KDE these days. "Even better than having bugs reported is having bugs fixed, of course. Which is exactly what's been happening in droves. From multi-screen fixes to panel hiding fixes to, yes, fixing that on-exit crash, we're smacking the bugs down as fast as we can so that next month's 4.6.1 release will be beautifully solid." http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2011/02/if-you-thought-460-was-good.html I haven't gone into the KDE bug data base, but were these known issues before they shipped ? And if so, why were they shipped ? And why is it going to take until next month to fix them ? I, myself, generally like KDE 4.6.0, but its not entirely stable. As far as I am concerned, its more beta software than something that should be used day to day. My specific problem is that Konqueror locks up the OS solid such that I have to reboot about twice a day. As I have multiple websites open at once, I am not sure what is triggering it. Very frustrating. Is there a way to configure yum such that one's computer is automagically always running one release behind whatever the current KDE release is ? Or a way to not upgrade to a .0 release and instead wait until the .1 release ? Honestly, I'm reaching the end of my rope with KDE. I like what they have done but its been a very, very long painful process. The path that we took to get here would have been a lot less tortuous if they just would have delayed every release they did by one release. Ie the quality of KDE's first release is generally very poor. The first releases should not have shipped to the public. Thanks for listening. _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
