I had no major problems with KNM4, but I keep using nm-applet, because it can import CiscoVPN config files and I'm too lazy to enter the settings by hand. Markus On Monday 19 July 2010 15:43:14 Rex Dieter wrote: > Rahul shared some of the same concern that Kevin did about this recent > change I made. > > I have to admit, I share some of the same pragmatic sentiments that > Rahul does (esp in areas where stability/features are even wider, like > with kpackagekit). > > Comments? > > -- Rex > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] +nm-applet > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:33:52 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> > To: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list > <spins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > +# provide nm-applet as fallback in cases where knm/nm-plasmoid fails > > +NetworkManager-gnome > > I assume this requires manual reconfiguration by the user. Couldn't knm > or nm-plasmoid whichever one is the future for KDE just be fixed to > support everything nm-applet does? If you don't have feature parity, > you should just bite the bullet and continue to include nm-applet by > default and ignore the purity angle. Including both is not the right > approach IMO. > > Rahul > _______________________________________________ > kde mailing list > kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde > New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
