Rahul shared some of the same concern that Kevin did about this recent change I made. I have to admit, I share some of the same pragmatic sentiments that Rahul does (esp in areas where stability/features are even wider, like with kpackagekit). Comments? -- Rex -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] +nm-applet Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:33:52 +0530 From: Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> To: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list <spins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > +# provide nm-applet as fallback in cases where knm/nm-plasmoid fails > +NetworkManager-gnome > I assume this requires manual reconfiguration by the user. Couldn't knm or nm-plasmoid whichever one is the future for KDE just be fixed to support everything nm-applet does? If you don't have feature parity, you should just bite the bullet and continue to include nm-applet by default and ignore the purity angle. Including both is not the right approach IMO. Rahul _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
