On Monday, July 19, 2010 15:43:14 Rex Dieter wrote: > Rahul shared some of the same concern that Kevin did about this recent > change I made. > > I have to admit, I share some of the same pragmatic sentiments that > Rahul does (esp in areas where stability/features are even wider, like > with kpackagekit). > > Comments? my gf uses knetworkmanager and she does not care, because does not need to know there is something like that at all, so knm is enough for her on the other hand I'm using nm because knm-vpnc bug for askpass and more importantly because knm vpn is missing feature "ipv4 : routes: [ ] Use this connection only for resources on its network" which is very important for me because I don't wont to have "local" internet radio routed twice over the ocean. Michal > -- Rex > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] +nm-applet > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:33:52 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> > To: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list > <spins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > +# provide nm-applet as fallback in cases where knm/nm-plasmoid fails > > +NetworkManager-gnome > > I assume this requires manual reconfiguration by the user. Couldn't knm > or nm-plasmoid whichever one is the future for KDE just be fixed to > support everything nm-applet does? If you don't have feature parity, > you should just bite the bullet and continue to include nm-applet by > default and ignore the purity angle. Including both is not the right > approach IMO. > > Rahul > _______________________________________________ > kde mailing list > kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde > New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
