When is Konqueror going to become a real browser ? Why hasn't it matured ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 27 of January 2009 19:33:29 Luk?? Tinkl wrote:
> Dne Tuesday 27. of January 2009 19:26:13 Linuxguy123 napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:06 +0000, Jos? Matos wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:52:28 Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > > > I knew that... I was hoping someone had an inside scoop or reason why
> > > > its the way it is.
> > >
> > > Several of us have (probably) some ideas why that has happened, on the
> > > other hand your preamble will turn us way from giving any kind of
> > > answer.
> > >
> > > For example what do you understand as a real browser? Do (e)links, lynx
> > > or dillo (among others) qualify? If the they don't qualify why are
> > > there users using them to browse the net?
> > >
> > > If you define a real browser as browser that deals with all the pages,
> > > then I am sorry but there aren't any. No single browser deals with all
> > > pages (imagine those IE-only pages, as an example) so there are no real
> > > browsers. QED.
> >
> > When will Konqueror work as well as Firefox does as far as handling
> > webpages without errors ?
>
> I think Jos? explained quite well your twisted perception of how the "real"
> browser should look like. I for one know of many webpages that work
> correctly in Konqueror but fail miserably in Firefox; guess why? Because
> these pages were designed for IE only

Once I helped one guy with testing web pages on Linux - it worked in Firefox, 
IE6 in wine but Konqueror failed - totally messed page. So I read w3c specs - 
and guess what? Konqueror was only one browser rendering it correctly (by w3c 
specs :).

Back to topic: there are possibilities to replace Konqueror - or at least 
KHTML - with WebKit. Arora is nice Qt 4 lightweight browser but looks now that 
development stalled for a while. One reason is maybe waiting for Qt 4.5 - it 
adds support of embedding Netscape plugins to QtWebKit. Another missing 
feature is password management. 
Try 'yum install arora'.

R.
-- 
Jaroslav ?ezn?k <jreznik at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux