On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:06 +0000, Jos? Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:52:28 Linuxguy123 wrote: > > I knew that... I was hoping someone had an inside scoop or reason why > > its the way it is. > > Several of us have (probably) some ideas why that has happened, on the other > hand your preamble will turn us way from giving any kind of answer. > > For example what do you understand as a real browser? Do (e)links, lynx or > dillo (among others) qualify? If the they don't qualify why are there users > using them to browse the net? > > If you define a real browser as browser that deals with all the pages, then I > am sorry but there aren't any. No single browser deals with all pages (imagine > those IE-only pages, as an example) so there are no real browsers. QED. When will Konqueror work as well as Firefox does as far as handling webpages without errors ?
