Dne Tuesday 27. of January 2009 19:26:13 Linuxguy123 napsal(a): > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:06 +0000, Jos? Matos wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:52:28 Linuxguy123 wrote: > > > I knew that... I was hoping someone had an inside scoop or reason why > > > its the way it is. > > > > Several of us have (probably) some ideas why that has happened, on the > > other hand your preamble will turn us way from giving any kind of answer. > > > > For example what do you understand as a real browser? Do (e)links, lynx > > or dillo (among others) qualify? If the they don't qualify why are there > > users using them to browse the net? > > > > If you define a real browser as browser that deals with all the pages, > > then I am sorry but there aren't any. No single browser deals with all > > pages (imagine those IE-only pages, as an example) so there are no real > > browsers. QED. > > When will Konqueror work as well as Firefox does as far as handling > webpages without errors ? I think Jos? explained quite well your twisted perception of how the "real" browser should look like. I for one know of many webpages that work correctly in Konqueror but fail miserably in Firefox; guess why? Because these pages were designed for IE only -- Luk?? Tinkl <ltinkl at redhat.com> Software Engineer
