On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 09:08:28AM -0000, Mattia Verga wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:58:14AM +0000, Mattia Verga wrote: > > > > No objection at all from me. ;) > > > > I have been very conservative in updating this stack since I don't want > > to break bodhi. If we can upgrade things and confirm bodhi is happy I am > > all for it. ;) > > > > kevin > > So, after Pyramid 2.0 was pushed to F38, Bodhi integration tests started to fail. > It seems that, despite Pyramid docs say that legacy authentication should still work [1], bodhi-client authentication fail. > > devel/ci/integration/tests/test_bodhi_tasks.py::test_update_edit FAILED [100%] > {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "HTTPForbidden", "description": "Unauthorized: new_update__POST failed permission check"}]} :( > I think we're still in time to retire the change proposal and fall back to Pyramid 1.x by untag everything related to the update, > or we can proceed and work on updating / fixing Bodhi before F37 goes EOL and we're forced to upgrade to F38 or higher. We can't just untag things, it's gone out now. We would have to add a Epoch and downgrade back to the old one, but that might break everyone using the fedora package, so thats not really a good idea. > I'm not sure how hard could be upgrade the authentication/authorization to the new method. Me either, but we should try... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue