> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:58:14AM +0000, Mattia Verga wrote:
>
> No objection at all from me. ;)
>
> I have been very conservative in updating this stack since I don't want
> to break bodhi. If we can upgrade things and confirm bodhi is happy I am
> all for it. ;)
>
> kevin
So, after Pyramid 2.0 was pushed to F38, Bodhi integration tests started to fail.
It seems that, despite Pyramid docs say that legacy authentication should still work [1], bodhi-client authentication fail.
devel/ci/integration/tests/test_bodhi_tasks.py::test_update_edit FAILED [100%]
{"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "HTTPForbidden", "description": "Unauthorized: new_update__POST failed permission check"}]}
I think we're still in time to retire the change proposal and fall back to Pyramid 1.x by untag everything related to the update, or we can proceed and work on updating / fixing Bodhi before F37 goes EOL and we're forced to upgrade to F38 or higher.
I'm not sure how hard could be upgrade the authentication/authorization to the new method.
Thoughts?
Mattia
[1] https://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/latest/whatsnew-2.0.html#upgrading-auth-20
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
