On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 09:00 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. > > > > We have 188 RHEL7 or RHEL8 instances (counting both vm's and bare > > hardware). > > > > > > Some will just not move anytime soon: > > > > > Is it possible to look at these as 'why does this need fedmsg?' 'what > happens if it doesn't have fedmsg', and 'do we need it?' FWIW, while I'm one of the holdouts on still needing PDC, I don't think anything I do with PDC relies on it publishing messages. Don't know if any other use cases of PDC do. I do think we need to sort out the key use cases of PDC before getting rid of it, but leaving it on RHEL 8 seems like it'd be a reasonable choice. We really ought to be able to sort out getting off PDC before RHEL 8 kicks the bucket. I'm kinda kicking the tires on a plan to move critpath handling into Bodhi at the moment, for one thing. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
