On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:54:14PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 09:00 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. > > > > > > We have 188 RHEL7 or RHEL8 instances (counting both vm's and bare > > > hardware). > > > > > > > > > Some will just not move anytime soon: > > > > > > > > Is it possible to look at these as 'why does this need fedmsg?' 'what > > happens if it doesn't have fedmsg', and 'do we need it?' > > FWIW, while I'm one of the holdouts on still needing PDC, I don't think > anything I do with PDC relies on it publishing messages. Don't know if > any other use cases of PDC do. > > I do think we need to sort out the key use cases of PDC before getting > rid of it, but leaving it on RHEL 8 seems like it'd be a reasonable (It's rhel7 actually) > choice. We really ought to be able to sort out getting off PDC before > RHEL 8 kicks the bucket. I'm kinda kicking the tires on a plan to move > critpath handling into Bodhi at the moment, for one thing. Yeah, we should definitely git rid of pdc... just need to move everything we use it for off. Might be good to sit down some folks and write up a detailed plan so we can poke at it. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
