I forked ssh-gpg-smartcard-config a while back before I got access to herlo's repo so I could update it. Now I have commit access to herlo's repo, so it may be unnecessary to have our fork (although I don't see what it hurts). I would like to look and see if the fedora-infra repo is linked to anywhere before we delete it.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:38 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We have 134 projects there:
> > - 45 of them are archived
> > - 1 is a mirror
> > - people2
> > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
> > - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
> > - Last commit on November 2020
> > - Seems up to date with its parent project
>
> I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info?
> But in any case I don't think we need it now.
>
> > - pyramid_fas_openid
> > - master branch
> > - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
> > - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
> > - develop branch
> > - last commits 2015
> > - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>
> Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure.
> At least bodhi-backend01 has:
> python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch
> installed.
Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork?
> > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may want to
> > find a better place:
> > - asknot-ng
> > - fedbages
> > - tahrir
> > - tahrir-api
>
> Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere...
>
> > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which are
> > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure.
>
> Still a lot. ;)
yup, though the split of the message schemas to different repo kind of
"artificially" increases that number (ie: maintaining 1 code-base, results in
two projects on github). Let's see how are things once we've cleaned them up a
little more :)
> > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to another
> > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable.
>
> We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know
> if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can.
Agreed, however archived projects are shown by default, if we find a way to hide
archived project by default I think that would be sufficient.
Basically, I'm looking for a way that it shows 57 or so projects by default
rather than 134.
Hoping it makes sense :)
Pierre
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
