On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 18. 06. 20 v 19:48 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Dne 17. 06. 20 v 19:54 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:23:38AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>> > >>> Theres not a seperate one for epel, but it might be possible to make > >>> one looking at bugzilla overrides. > >> > >> Just to give you a bit of context, this alias would be useful when > >> introducing new package into RHEL, where the package is already present > >> in EPEL and therefore have to be removed. So it would help with a way to > >> contact the relevant people without the need of gathering their emails. > > Yeah, +1. This would be a great use for that alias. > > > Should I open a ticket? Is this realistic any time soon? For documenting the aliases? Well, you can edit the wiki... or did you want a better place for it, like in docs? Or did you mean getting RHEL maintainers to mail it when introducing new packages to RHEL? Thats beyond our scope here, and would have to be some internal process. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
