Re: Is the <package>-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx alias documented somewhere?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 18. 06. 20 v 19:48 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 17. 06. 20 v 19:54 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:23:38AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
>>> Theres not a seperate one for epel, but it might be possible to make
>>> one looking at bugzilla overrides.
>>
>> Just to give you a bit of context, this alias would be useful when
>> introducing new package into RHEL, where the package is already present
>> in EPEL and therefore have to be removed. So it would help with a way to
>> contact the relevant people without the need of gathering their emails.
> Yeah, +1. This would be a great use for that alias. 


Should I open a ticket? Is this realistic any time soon?


Vít



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux