On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote: > I still need to handle a few cases (e.g. subpackages) but everything > looks good so far. Generating the whole static website is quite fast > (minutes including repository metadata sync, seconds otherwise). > > Screenshot attached :-) Nice. starting to look good. ;) > I should have something usable by next week. If I were to deploy it > somewhere, would it be in communityshift (= container)? When is > communityshift supposed to come back online? Yeah, that would be a nice place for it. It goes down monday and back up in a few weeks (depends on how long it takes to ship and rack up and bring back up). > Would it be possible to allocate the pkg.fedoraproject.org domain for > this service? I think that would be confusing. We have pkgs.fedoraproject.org (which is the ssh hostname for src.fedoraproject.org), so pkg would be pretty confusing to them. I think packages is even confusing too. But I'm not sure what (if anything) would be less confusing... debian uses 'packages' also, FWIW. > If there is no server space available due to the datacenter move, I'm > pretty sure I can ask $DAYJOB (https://datacenterlight.ch/) to sponsor a > VM for the next few months (against a mention in footer or similar). Cool. Well, communishift should be back before too long... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
