On 06/25/2018 12:33 AM, jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Sat, 2018-06-23 at 11:23 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 06/22/2018 09:38 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: >> >>> Yeah, that looks good: >>> - lack of backup/mirroring should not be a problem (the results are >>> more or less >>> ephemeral anyway & we can easily back them up internally if needed) >>> - upload speed should not be an issue for the PR test logs & we >>> plan to publish daily logs >>> from kickstart test runs, so even if there was a ~hour delay for >>> uploding the logs it should not >>> make much difference for once-a-day run. >>> >>> Using the existing gitanaconda group should be fine as well, >>> thanks. :) >>> >>> BTW, how would you recommend to handle the automated log uploads to >>> this space ? >>> >>> Is there some interface where we can set a SSH public key, so that >>> the test runner >>> can upload the logs there or something similar ? >> >> Other groups (cockpit at least) have created a fas user. I'd suggest >> something with 'bot' in the name like 'anaconda-bot'. Then login and >> set >> it's ssh key and add it to the group. > > We already have bot user with name: installker ok. You should be able to use that as long as you add it to the group. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/6PFTSYDQAOATHM33DBBMXUWXLWA5TDBU/
