On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:12:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > There's no real technical reason why it can't be a tenant, OSBS these > days is OpenShift namespace aware. However, from a Fedora Project > standpoint I expect we'll keep OSBS on it's own independent > installation because it's in the builder network within the Fedora > Infrastructure and therefore is quite locked down compared to what > people would expect out of a traditional OpenShift environment (for > example, containers don't have access to the outside Internet). Could we do that lock-down with OpenShift multitenant features? Like: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/admin_guide/managing_pods.html#admin-guide-limit-pod-access-egress -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
