On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:40:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup >> in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for >> the FLIBS. > > I know that as is now OSBS requires a special independent installation > of OpenShift. This is probably too much to hope for, but is there any > chance that OSBS has advanced such that future-FLIBS could just be a > tenant of that instance once it graduates from staging? > > > There's no real technical reason why it can't be a tenant, OSBS these days is OpenShift namespace aware. However, from a Fedora Project standpoint I expect we'll keep OSBS on it's own independent installation because it's in the builder network within the Fedora Infrastructure and therefore is quite locked down compared to what people would expect out of a traditional OpenShift environment (for example, containers don't have access to the outside Internet). If there was a point in time where Infrastructure and Release Engineering criteria about the build infrastructure were to change, we could technically make the transition. -AdamM > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
