Re: Requesting Feedback: Logging solution for loopabull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/05/2017 10:33 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
>     I am in need of a publicly accessible location to have logs hosted
> (or mirrored) from loopabull[0] in order to provide public-facing
> feedback on what's actually going on with the automated tasks.

Who is the audience here? Sysadmins that want to confirm the playbook
ran the way they wanted?

> For background/context, there are docs what loopabull is[0] and how
> Fedora RelEng is currently aiming to use it[1][2].
> 
> If it's acceptable, I would like to use OpenStack's Project ARA[3] for
> this but that is "yet another service" and if there's something
> readily available from the Fedora Infrastructure then I'd certainly
> like to go that route. I'm also completely open to alternative
> solutions, whatever the Fedora Infrastructure Team thinks it best.

How about logging to syslog and viewing that on log01?

Or using the logdetail2 callback plugin we have on batcave01/ansible
repo and just logging to files locally on loopabull01?

Is there a requirement for a pretty web interface? We can do that, it's
just going to take some cycles to make sure we don't expose anything we
shouldn't and do it right.

kevin



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux