Re: Pagure on dist-git, the state of things

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:45:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:

> - With pkgdb out of the loop, we'll need to figure some things out:
>   - Where/How to store the contact info for bugzilla
>     - Not sure relying on pagure's ACLs there is the way to go since we would
>       loose a level of granularity in the ACLs that I know people like and ask
>       for (having commit w/o being on the CC list in bugzilla or being on the CC
>       list w/o being a packager)
>   - How/when to require people be part of the packager group in FAS?
>     - Since one of the idea of pagure is to make it easier for "drive-by"
>       contribution to spec files, requiring to be a packager should only be
>       there for maintainers, but pagure doesn't have this level of
>       information/requirement, so we would need to find something or some place
>       to add this requirement or see if that requirement still stands

sorry if I missed it, but pkgdb manages some more things where I not yet
understand how this maps to the pagure dist-git workflow:

- Request a new package to be added to pagure dist-git/a package to be
  unretired
- Requests for new (EPEL) branches
- Orphan/Retire a package
- Manage development status of collections (In development, live, EOL)
- Configuring upstream release monitoring
- Manage koshei integration

Kind regards
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux