Good Morning Everyone, I figured it has been a while since I reported progress on making pagure a front-end for dist-git. So here is a small status update. What works: - Well currently pagure is working as a front-end for dist-git in stg: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/ - Hosting repos, browsing them, creating PR works all fine (w/ one , see below) - Features we want to exclude have been turned off (no user management on the pagure side) What does not work: - Syncing the ACLs from pkgdb to gitolite takes ~3 minutes in prod, in stg, the updated script in stg (which sync the ACLs from pkgdb to gitolite and pagure) runs in ~30/35 minutes (if it doesn't crash, which my last run just did) This is a blocker since it means it takes 30 to 35 minutes for someone to get access to their git repo or (worse) their fork - This pagure instance has the same issue as the main one, including a heisenbug we're trying to track but have had no luck reproducing so far :( What needs to be done: - Fix the sync script - Make it *way* faster than it is - Make it creates the project on pagure using the releng user rather than relying on the first contributor it finds in the list of maintainers - Make fedmsg-genacls be triggered on pagure's fork fedmsg message so that we re-generate the gitolite configuration file when someone forks a project (and thus give them access to their fork) - Once above is done: call for more testers In the future: - I think we will want to deprecate pkgdb entirely, so while the work above is important, ideally it won't be there for too long. - With pkgdb out of the loop, we'll need to figure some things out: - Where/How to store the contact info for bugzilla - Not sure relying on pagure's ACLs there is the way to go since we would loose a level of granularity in the ACLs that I know people like and ask for (having commit w/o being on the CC list in bugzilla or being on the CC list w/o being a packager) - How/when to require people be part of the packager group in FAS? - Since one of the idea of pagure is to make it easier for "drive-by" contribution to spec files, requiring to be a packager should only be there for maintainers, but pagure doesn't have this level of information/requirement, so we would need to find something or some place to add this requirement or see if that requirement still stands This is all I can think of for now, I'll update this thread if I come up with more ideas/challenges. Have a nice day, Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
