Can you please report this to releng also? Dennis El jue, 20-04-2017 a las 15:45 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I figured it has been a while since I reported progress on making > pagure a > front-end for dist-git. > > So here is a small status update. > > What works: > - Well currently pagure is working as a front-end for dist-git in > stg: > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/ > - Hosting repos, browsing them, creating PR works all fine (w/ one , > see > below) > - Features we want to exclude have been turned off (no user > management on the > pagure side) > > What does not work: > - Syncing the ACLs from pkgdb to gitolite takes ~3 minutes in prod, > in stg, the > updated script in stg (which sync the ACLs from pkgdb to gitolite > and pagure) > runs in ~30/35 minutes (if it doesn't crash, which my last run just > did) > This is a blocker since it means it takes 30 to 35 minutes for > someone to get > access to their git repo or (worse) their fork > - This pagure instance has the same issue as the main one, including > a heisenbug > we're trying to track but have had no luck reproducing so far :( > > What needs to be done: > - Fix the sync script > - Make it *way* faster than it is > - Make it creates the project on pagure using the releng user > rather than > relying on the first contributor it finds in the list of > maintainers > - Make fedmsg-genacls be triggered on pagure's fork fedmsg message > so that we > re-generate the gitolite configuration file when someone forks a > project > (and thus give them access to their fork) > - Once above is done: call for more testers > > In the future: > - I think we will want to deprecate pkgdb entirely, so while the work > above is > important, ideally it won't be there for too long. > - With pkgdb out of the loop, we'll need to figure some things out: > - Where/How to store the contact info for bugzilla > - Not sure relying on pagure's ACLs there is the way to go since > we would > loose a level of granularity in the ACLs that I know people > like and ask > for (having commit w/o being on the CC list in bugzilla or > being on the CC > list w/o being a packager) > - How/when to require people be part of the packager group in FAS? > - Since one of the idea of pagure is to make it easier for > "drive-by" > contribution to spec files, requiring to be a packager should > only be > there for maintainers, but pagure doesn't have this level of > information/requirement, so we would need to find something or > some place > to add this requirement or see if that requirement still stands > > This is all I can think of for now, I'll update this thread if I come > up with > more ideas/challenges. > > > Have a nice day, > Pierre > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproj > ect.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
