On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 18:19 +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > > > This is a very reasonable proposal, but could represent a problem for > some in an indirect way. My personal blog is currently hosted in a > manner that makes using https not possible.[^0] I don't know if > others are in a similar situation, but it is reasonable to think > so. Enabling https is one thing, but in my case a full migration > will be required. Is there a reason we need to require the blogs > that are aggregated to be https and not just encourage it and move > the planet to https? Sounds like we may be in the same boat... I use github pages with a custom domain and it does not appear to support https at the moment. I am researching to see if that is accurate and what my other options are. Perhaps when we announce this it would be good to have a few Fedora Magazine / CommBlog article on how to enable https:// on popular blog hosting sites that people may use in addition to some options for people to migrate too. Charles
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
