Re: https blogs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote:
> Le 2017-02-14 20:10, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> > There's no real security advantage here, other than making more traffic
> > on the net encrypted, which I think is a good goal.
> > 
> > What do folks think? Doable? To harsh? Pointless?
> 
> Do you have any statistics of the number of blog that should migrate? Total
> blog number, total blog with partial https (is it easy to detect?), total
> blog with full https.
 
  I've tried to estimated this, using http://fedoraplanet.org/heads.html:

  – there are 716 blogs in total 
    * 284 URLs start with https://
    * 432 URLs start with http://
  
  - if I do s/http/https/ and try to access the blogs (of 432 "http://"; ones):
     - 225 over https returned content with roughly the same size as returned over http
     - 209 weren't accessible by https
     - 34 weren't accessible by http, either

  I did not check if those 225 "forced https" contain any mixed content.

Summary:
  - we have 716 blogs on Planet
  - we can access (284+225=)  509 of them over https
  - by forcing https we would loose ~ 200 blogs

-- 
Tomasz Torcz            There exists no separation between gods and men:
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx   one blends softly casual into the other.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux