On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 07:15:59PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote: > Le 30 janvier 2017 20:12:45 UTC+01:00, "Brian (bex) Exelbierd" <bex@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >>> Wanna use the builder for the new budget infrastructure? It could > >>> also potentially host the docs. > >> > >> I think pagure docs might be a better fit for this... we can then use > >> the normal PR setup for changes, etc... > > > >I'm happy for you to use the best tool for you. The process I am > >talking about is PR driven. > > > If possible, I would love to see the new documentation system used for this, in addition of the re-use of the tool chain and the documentation portal, some team may found the need for localization, and it would made this possible. Well, the documentation we are talking about here are the internal procedures to follow in the infrastructure. They aren't really meant to be user-facing, much more a place for new comers to learn our procedures and for old-timers to find back "how do we do that again?". I do not think this documentation deserve being merged with the general documentation about Fedora, this is something that is really specific to this group and our setup. For this reason, I also think translations shouldn't be a priority. I wouldn't go against if someone wanted to translates these docs but I will also not encourage it very strongly :) Just my thoughts though :) Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
