On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from FAS2 to > FAS3. > > We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: > - cla_dell > - cla_done > - cla_ibm > - cla_fedora > - cla_redhat > - cla_click > - cla_intel > - cla_fpca > > For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement: > `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 as > having signed that new license agreement. > > The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by creating > their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only > interested in the FPCA group these days? > > Thoughts? I think some of the alternate groups have value still to some Fedora participants. We may want to consult Spot, who knows more about the history of those groups. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
