On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:12:18AM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 11/03/2016 07:18 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from FAS2 to > > FAS3. > > > > We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: > > - cla_dell > > - cla_done > > - cla_ibm > > - cla_fedora > > - cla_redhat > > - cla_click > > - cla_intel > > - cla_fpca > > > > For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement: > > `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 as > > having signed that new license agreement. > > > > The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by creating > > their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only > > interested in the FPCA group these days? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > From a usability standpoint, even though these groups are deprecated, I > still see a notable number of new people apply to these groups (even if > they're not employees of said companies). It can also be a little confusing > with the FPCA in place too. If it's easy to do so, it's my opinion that it > would make more sense to keep it all to one group. :) My preference is also to just keep cla_fpca and call it a day, but then we loose some data/history. So the question is: do we care about that data/history? Since those CLAs are no longer used, we could no care, I just want to make sure it's the case :) Thanks, Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
