Re: Warn secondary arch folks about change involving: ExclusiveArch or ExcludesArch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:24:39PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> so anything that adds or excludes %{arm} armv7hl aarch64 should go to fedora-
> arm-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ppc64 ppc64p7 and ppc64le should go to fedora-ppc-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> and snything excluding s390x should go to fedora-s390-
> members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

The hook is now deployed and sending everything to me for now.
I'll adjust it based on these suggestions.

One thing I realized is that now is that there might be some false-positive, for
example:
````
The package rpms/R-DynDoc.git has added or updated either ExclusiveArch or
ExcludesArch
in commit(s):
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/R-DynDoc.git/commit/?id=1186b2e7013aeaa3e88c5b36541a4b841f3b7dc3.

Change:
+ExclusiveArch:    armv7, ppc, go_arch
````

But all I did was adding 'go_arch', so two solutions:
1) warn arm and ppc folks again
2) make some of diff between:
   -ExclusiveArch:    armv7, ppc
   +ExclusiveArch:    armv7, ppc, go_arch
   and extract which arch got changed to warn only the groups of interest

Thoughts?

There are also changes such as:
+ExclusiveArch:  %{?go_arches:%{go_arches}}%{!?go_arches:%{ix86} x86_64 %{arm}}

How should these be treated? Warn the alternative-arch list? arm?


Thanks,
Pierre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux