> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:13:25AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > That can very well be and I missed it, so let's please s/secondary/alternative/g > here :) Please! > The hook will point out any commit that is touching either ExclusiveArch or > ExcludesArch, regardless of the arch impacted. > There will be false-positive for sure (for example epel packages introduced in > certain arch which doesn't exist in RHEL). Can the hook exclude anything in EPEL? > Is there an alternative-arch-sig list of some sort? secondary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ironic, I know). It might be worth looking at migrating that list to alternative-arches or something. josh _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
